Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in Public Relations Writing: A Literary-Rhetorical Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65486/0ftkfm49Keywords:
Rhetoric, Public Relations, Ethos, Pathos, LogosAbstract
This study addresses the scarcity of literary-analytical attention dedicated to public relations writing by examining organisational literature as a form of persuasive discourse. It establishes a comprehensive literary-rhetorical framework based on the classical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos to demonstrate how these elements function linguistically and narratively to shape credibility, emotional engagement, and logical reasoning within institutional communication. Employing qualitative textual analysis that bridges classical rhetoric, literary studies, and public relations scholarship, the research analyses specific PR documents, such as news releases and public statements, treating them as strategic, manufactured narratives designed to influence public opinion. The findings indicate that the efficacy of PR writing relies on a precise balance of ethical authority, emotional resonance, and logical argumentation. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that these persuasive strategies mirror techniques typically found in literary texts, suggesting that organisational documents operate as highly sophisticated narrative constructions. By fusing rhetorical analysis with PR theory, this study offers an advanced conceptual framework that enhances the critical comprehension of professional communication and argues that PR education can be enriched by adopting literary-rhetorical methodologies to foster ethical consciousness and audience-cantered strategies. Ultimately, this research presents a novel interdisciplinary approach connecting the humanities with communication studies, highlighting the enduring relevance of classical rhetoric in modern professional practice and providing a new analytical lens for evaluating the persuasive power of organisational discourse.
Downloads
References
[1]. Bade, D. (2009). Ethos, logos, pathos or sender, message, receiver: A problem at logical rhetoric for information technologies. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 7(47), 612–630.
[2]. Berlanga, I., García-García, F., & Victoria, J. S. (2013). Ethos, Pathos and Logos in Facebook. User Networking: New «Rhetor» of the 21st Century. Comunicar, 21(41).
[3]. Brock, B. L., Chesebro, J. W., & Scott, R. L. (1989). Methods of rhetorical criticism: A twentieth-century perspective. Wayne State University Press.
[4]. Cătău-Vereș, D. (2019). Contemporary Forms and Strategies of Discursive Manipulation: Storytelling or the Art of Telling Stories on the Public Stage. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 2(6), 203–212.
[5]. Cătău-Vereș, D. (2020). Persuasive discursive elements in the public relations campaign of image reconstruction: logos, ethos and pathos. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 1(7), 43–49.
[6]. Connors, R. J. (1979). The differences between speech and writing: Ethos, pathos, and logos. College Composition & Communication, 3(30), 285–290.
[7]. Gottweis, H. (2017). Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos, and pathos. Routledge, 263–276.
[8]. Gruber-Miller, J. (2006). Teaching writing in beginning Latin and Greek: logos, ethos, and pathos. When Dead Tongues Speak: Teaching Beginning Greek and Latin, 190–219.
[9]. Heacock, C. L. (2010). The integration of postmodern values and rhetorical analysis: A case study.
[10]. Higgins, C., & Walker, R. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Elsevier, 36(3), 194–208.
[11]. Karagevrekis, M. (2012). Multimodal text analysis of three modern Greek printed advertisements employing the persuasive modes of ethos, logos and pathos. In Multimodal Texts from Around the World: Cultural and Linguistic Insights . London: Palgrave , 69–96.
[12]. Mackey, S. (2013). A sophistic rhetorical approach to public relations. PRism, 1(10), 1–14.
[13]. Marsh, C. W. (2003). Public relations ethics: Contrasting models from the rhetoric of Plato, Aristotle, and Isocrates. Routledge, 78–98.
[14]. Oeppen Hill, J. H. (2020). Logos, ethos, pathos and the marketing of higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1(30), 87–104.
[15]. Ofori, D. M. (2019). Grounding Twenty-first-Century Public Relations Praxis in Aristotelian Ethos. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1–2(31), 50–69.
[16]. Saaty, A. (2020). The Rhetoric of Twitter in Terms of the Aristotelian Appeals (“ Logos, Ethos, and Pathos”) in ESL/EFL Educational Settings. English Language Teaching, 5(13), 115–124.
[17]. Smith, R. D. (2003). Becoming a public relations writer: A writing process workbook for the profession. Taylor & Francis.
[18]. Treadwell, D., & Treadwell, J. B. (2005). Public relations writing: Principles in practice. Sage.
[19]. Vaxevanidou, M. (2016). Public diplomacy as a tool to change the image of a country in crisis. Journal of Media Critiques, 2(8), 111–120.
[20]. Wróbel, S. (2015). Logos, ethos, pathos. Classical rhetoric revisited. Polish Sociological Review, 191(3), 401–421.
[21]. Zhiyong, D. (2016). Logo, Pathos and Ethos in David Cameron’s Political Speech: A Rhetorical Analysis. KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(6), 63–74.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arghand Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
